IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Nos. 04-35182 & 04-35183 ______
Brief of petitioner for Exxon Shipping Co., v. Baker, 07-219
The Supreme Court Limits Punitive Damages Award In The Exxon Valdez Case To 1:1 Ratio To Compensatory Damages
Punitive Damages After Exxon Shipping Company v. Baker: The Quest for Predictability and the Role of Juries
Justices Take Up Battle Over Exxon Valdez - The New York Times
Brief of respondent for Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 07-219
EVOS Oil Spill Supreme Court Case
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker] Reactions | C-SPAN.org
Exxon v. Baker: Legislating Spills into the Judiciary: How the Supreme Court Sank Maritime Punitive Damages
High court to hear Exxon Valdez damages case - CSMonitor.com
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker: The Supreme Court Tightens the Purse Strings on Corporate Punitive Awards
DOC) The Exxon Valdez Disaster: State of Alaska v. Hazelwood and Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker | Andrew Marshello - Academia.edu
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker] Reactions | C-SPAN.org
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 128 S.Ct. 2605, 171 L.Ed.2d 570 (2008): Case Brief Summary - Quimbee
Punitive Damages by Numbers: Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker: Supreme Court Economic Review: Vol 18
From One Footnote, a Debate Over the Tangles of Law, Science and Money - The New York Times
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker] Reactions | C-SPAN.org
Brief of Ship Masters and Expert Mariners ... - The Whole Truth
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker] Reactions | C-SPAN.org
Exxon Shipping Co. V. Baker: Sailing Into The Confluence Of Common Law And Constitutional Standards For Punitive Damages - Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
PDF) Brief of Amicus Curiae filed in support of respondents in U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 07-219: Exxon Shipping Co., and Exxon Mobil Corp. (Petitioners) v. Grant Baker, et al. (Respondents).
Exxon Shipping Company v. Grant Baker. On Writ of Certiorari.
